T
he Armenian capital Yerevan is chock-a-block right now with officials, scientists and environmentalists from all over the world gathering for Cop17. Everyone is here to try to rescue a historic deal to end the destruction of nature.
The pressure is on. Targets set for 2030 are woefully off track, and the nearly 200 countries present need to agree on a plan to speed things up. All this is happening at a time when national budgets are tight and leaders are distracted by conflict, protests and the global energy crisis.
But first, this week’s most important reads.
Essential reads
- This Norwegian village is one of the fastest-warming places on Earth. How can its people save it?
- What does the UK’s approval of the Jackdaw gasfield mean?
- US extreme weather survivors are a growing group – now they want to be a political force
In focus
The Persian leopard, spotted on a camera trap in Gndasar Community Conserved Area. Photograph: Gndasar Environmental-Social NGO
There have been snippets of positive news. Just a week before the conference began, a Persian leopard, one of Armenia’s rarest and most endangered animals, was spotted in the southern-central region of the country.
“It was late, we came home and then one of my caretakers [rangers] called me and said, ‘I have amazing news,’” Syuzi Karapetyan, a teacher who also leads the Gndasar Social-Environmental NGO, explained when I visited her village on Saturday. She had goosebumps when she heard the news, she said.
Persian leopards, also known as Caucasian leopards, were once widespread across western and central Asia, but their range has shrunk dramatically. There are thought to be no more than 10 leopards in Armenia, as poaching and habitat destruction have devastated its population.
The discovery of a new individual, never spotted before in the country, has delighted Karapetyan and local people, who in partnership with WWF have rebuilt the population of bezoar goats, one of the leopard’s key prey species, and found ways to protect its habitats.
The question of how to save our most endangered species is a critical issue being discussed at Cop17. Scientists have warned of the rapid annihilation of wildlife, far above natural background levels, with some saying we are in the midst of a mass extinction event, driven by human overpopulation and overconsumption.
A commitment to protect endangered species was one of 23 targets that governments set four years ago, and which they are not on track to meet.
Lots of governments still haven’t mobilised resources, partly because they don’t know where to focus, says Dr Kira Mileham, who co-chairs the Reverse the Red Action Partnership, which supports governments to tackle species loss.
There might be hundreds of species at risk within a country’s borders; which should they prioritise?
This week, Armenia and Colombia announced an initiative, the Coalition of Action to Recover Endangered Species (Cares), a government coalition that aims to help countries assess where to focus their efforts. Some species might not need much dedicated action, as long as parallel efforts – for example to protect their habitat – are under way. Others might need more focused, species-specific interventions such as protection from disease or, if their numbers are very low, help to enable them to breed.
skip past newsletter promotion
Free newsletter |
Weekly
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
Enter your email
Sign up
The Cares alliance will help governments to assess which of the species in need of specific support are already receiving attention from NGOs or research institutions, and which are falling through the cracks, and connect them with experts, says Mileham. Reverse the Red will serve as the secretariat of Cares.
It’s then up to governments to develop a plan, and find resources to support it. So far, 17 countries, including the UK, have joined the Cares alliance to share best practice.
Separately, nine private funders and organisations, including Leonardo DiCaprio’s Re:wild, have said they will commit more than $500m over the next five years to recover the world’s most threatened species.
The money has been welcomed, but it also matters how it is spent. There is still a huge bias in how conservation funding is allocated, with larger, charismatic animals such as leopards, tigers and elephants sweeping up the majority of resources. “Decisions need to be taken based on the scientific information that is available, and not just because some are cute, which unfortunately is what happens,” says Benoit Guénard, associate professor at the University of Hong Kong, who has researched the distribution of conservation funds.
Many conservationists hope money will be better targeted, with resources spread more evenly – and that fungi, algae and amphibians might see some of the success enjoyed by the Persian leopard.
Read more:
‘Crucial opportunity to act’ as study finds most of Europe’s wild bee species in decline
World must cut emissions by 18% in four years ‘to find our way back’, UN says
To read the complete version of this newsletter – subscribe to receive Down to Earth in your inbox every Thursday.
… we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing more than 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. Will you make a difference and support us too?
Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful.
And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the global events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it.
Whether you give a little or a lot, the support of readers like you from Cambodia will power our reporting for the years to come.




